Monday, February 02, 2009
Posted by: John & Cisco at 5:00 AM
spent the most on stimulus package

View in ascending order View in descending order
CATX writes: Monday, February, 02, 2009 11:53 AM
Wealth redistribution....
Redistribution occurs all the time, just depends on what direction it is headed. Over the past 8 years it has been redistributed up, to no complaint from Repugs, now it is time to go in reverse. Yin and yang my friend….. yin and yang.
Ddon writes: Monday, February, 02, 2009 12:04 PM
Now hear this:
The Polosi bill will cost maybe three hundred billion in interest. Tax cuts don't come with interest. We do need to reduce mortgage rates for everyone in America to refinance. That will put $500 a month in everyone's pocket and we won't have to pay interest to China.

PresidentialBalls.com
Susan writes: Monday, February, 02, 2009 1:33 PM
Catx
Over the past 8 years redistribution has occured to the "up?" How can you redistribute from the poor when they have nothing to redistribute? You speak out of your ars. If you take from the productive and give to the non productive then you have socialism. If you want something go out and work for it. You do understand that there is always someone who has more then you and someone who has less. How much you willing to give up?
Ozark_Sunshine writes: Monday, February, 02, 2009 2:28 PM
Catx
No one redistributed wealth UP to me. I got my education and I worked for it. If you and the other loser liberals can't get off your fat behinds and get your education or work, then it is not my problem. If you are too stupid to get ahead, maybe you out to go to Washington state and volunteer for euthenasia. I'll tell you the same thing I tell my uneducated relatives when they complain. You made your choices, now live with them. Quit whining and holding out your hand for dole. Get away from the criminal unions who try and bankrupt industries and make them move overseas. Life is about personal responsibility and pride. You must be real proud to want to support something that only morons support.
mitchrodee writes: Thursday, February, 26, 2009 3:01 PM
Trickle up instead of trickle down
Since the past eight years of Bush administration has resulted in the mess we're in, then it's only natural to try doing something different to create a change. That's why and how Obama got elected, he offered more of a change than McCain/Palin. Had the vast majority of people felt like they were prospering toward the end of Bush's second term, Obama wouldn't have had a chance. As Reagan asked, "Are you better off now than you were four years ago?"
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

Daily Commentary
Daily Commentary
The First Press Conference
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast
Dennis Prager
Dennis Prager
Open Lines
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast
Michael Medved
Michael Medved
this is a medved teaser
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast